Statement: 10th anniversary of the attack on Charlie Hebdo magazine

Jan 7, 2025 | News

On January 7th 2015, a devastating terrorist attack was made upon those present at the offices of Charlie Hebdo magazine in Paris, leaving a dozen people dead, including staff and contributors as well as police officers.

Among the victims at Charlie Hebdo were renowned cartoonists Stéphane “Charb” Charbonnier, Jean “Cabu” Cabut, Georges Wolinski, Bernard “Tignous” Verlhac, and Philippe Honoré – men who had dedicated their lives to using humor and satire to provoke thought and challenge authority. Their courage and commitment to free expression inspired many, even in the face of repeated threats. And this atrocity was all the more shocking for its location, in what seems to most cartoonists, then and now, their natural haven – the nation of France.

The outpouring of grief that followed, including the “Je Suis Charlie” sentiment that encircled the globe, underlined the nature of cartoonists’ role in society. Their work pushes boundaries, questions power and forces us to confront uncomfortable truths. While their art can spark controversy, it is precisely this ability to provoke debate that makes satire so vital to a free and open democracy. Silencing cartoonists – or any form of critical expression – isn’t just an attack on the individuals; it threatens the values of dialogue, tolerance, and the right to dissent.

As an organization dedicated to defending the human rights of cartoonists, we know how often they face harassment, intimidation, and violence simply for doing their job. Protecting cartoonists is about more than ensuring their safety – it’s about preserving the diversity of view and freedom of expression that underpins democratic societies.

We commend the French president, Emmanuel Macron and the Ministère de la Culture’s efforts to establish a Maison du Dessin de Presse in Paris. While it is very important that such an institute preserves and promotes editorial cartooning and its cherished position within French culture, it will also serve as a beacon for cartoonists maligned and abused in other parts of the world. As such, we sincerely hope that consideration is given in policy, provision made in budget, and space reserved within the location itself for the needs of exiled cartoonists, comparable to that found in other Maison du Journalistes and places of safety for writers and artists around Europe.

A decade on from that dreadful day, we reaffirm our commitment to defending cartoonists and their right to create without fear. A society without the freedom to laugh, question, or criticize is no society at all.


Charlie Hebdo essay by Ann Telnaes, part 1

"It has been a decade since the Charlie Hebdo killings. Since then, cartoonists have faced increasing accusations that their work is offensive. "

PICTURED: a female cartoonist sits at her drawing board, second- and third-guessing herself with each new idea until she gives up.
Charlie Hebdo essay by Ann Telnaes, part 2

"Many of these controversies are created by people and special-interest groups who change te narrative of a cartoon to the fit their own agenda, and that's dangerous for a democracy. We've seen what intolerance and religious restrictions on freedom of expression can lead to; so, what are the characteristics that get cartoonists in trouble? The use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to criticize political and topical issues."

PICTURED: a gravestone bearing the date of the Charlie Hebdo attack, Jan 7, 205; a boiling pot labelled "trouble"; a jester's hat labelled "satire".
Charlie Hebdo essay by Ann Telnaes, part 3

"Caricatures and visual metaphors, are part of a cartoonists's language and again can misrepresented by special interest groups to suit their political agenda. They're all part of a cartoonist;s tools to create opinion art."

PICTURED: a female cartoonist sketches an enormous nose in profile; a collection of metaphors includes a US flag flying upside down, a light bulb, a dove of peace, a torch of liberty, a bomb, a bullhorn, an hour glass, a red herring, a whistle, a rat, and a pregnant female figure.
Charlie Hebdo essay by Ann Telnaes, part 4

"Some people think the solution is to limit what cartoonists may draw, but when limits are put in cartoons, it can dampen the message and that silences voices who speak out against autocratic politicians and governments."

PICTURED: a group of large, intimidating figures crowd behind a male cartoonist at his drawing board telling him to "watch it"; the same cartoonist is then shown gagged; a number of spotlights stand darkened, their power chords severed.