BLOG

Algeria: international cartoon festival “sabotaged”

Share

Cartoonist reports cancellation of international exhibition, contends he is victim of a conspiracy.

Our attention has been drawn to the cancellation of the inaugural Salon international de la caricature, du dessin de presse et d’humour d’Oran, Algeria which had been set to take place in May.

The organizer, cartoonist Nour El Yakine Ferhaoui was forced to change plans and rather than have a physical show put on a “Salon virtuelle” in co-operation with Le Matin newspaper.

In an interview with the Algerian edition of Le Matin Ferhaoui names his guarantors as Kouider Bouziane, the current Director of Culture of the city of Oran and Boucif Belhachemi, the regional director of the National Office of Copyright and Neighboring Law of Oran (ONDA) before the entire project was “derailed”.

Further he accuses an unnamed Algerian cartoonist closely associated with FIBDA (the International Comics Festival of Algiers) of harrassment and making statements to the effect that he “sabotaged” the event in Oran. Ferhaoui tells us he has been rendered “persona non grata” in Algeria.

CRNI’s regional representative in Canada, cartoonist Guy “Bado” Badeaux covered the Salon on his blog earlier this year. Ferhaoui had attracted participation from dozens of cartoonists in twelve nations as well as across Algeria and made arrangement for visas for six foreign visitors during his event.

Professional jealousy comes with the territory in the creative sector but the suggestion that cartoonists would stymie each others’ endeavours in a country like Algeria where colleagues have been actively silenced by the authorities on more than one occasion is especially troubling.

Ferhaoui will attend the 37th Salon international de la caricature, du dessin de presse et d’humour in Saint-Just-le-Martel, France later this year and provide a fuller account of the incident at the annual meeting of France-Cartoons.

 To Report a Cartoonist in Danger  Email Cartoonists Rights Network

Cartoonist Pedro Molina’s View on the Violence and Political Crackdown in Nicaragua

Share

Cartoonists often complain that politicians are unfair competition because they can be crazier than our cartoons. This is particularly true in Nicaragua, where I live and work as a cartoonist.

We have a government formed by a married couple: President Daniel Ortega and his wife, Vice President Rosario Murillo. The only time they venture out of “El Carmen,” their private housing complex, is for ceremonial events that are covered by most television and radio media in the country, which, by the way, they own.

Despite calling themselves “socialist revolutionaries,” the Ortega family are actually multimillionaires (thanks to Venezuela’s oil business) with a special taste for things like Mercedes Benz cars, Rolex watches and caviar. Our first lady, Murillo, the most extravagant of the duo, has filled the country with huge ridiculous metal “trees” she calls “Trees of Life” at the price of $ 25,000 each; we have hundreds of them! In the second poorest country in Latin America!

As you can imagine, Nicaragua was a cartooning paradise, with lots of potentially funny material for political cartoonists like me … until April 18 of this year.

After several years of suffering electoral frauds, curtailment of rights, selective repression, attempts to censor the internet and mismanagement of environmental disasters, the last straw was the enactment of the country’s social security law that curtails the rights of current and future pensioners.

Protests began timidly in a country where protests, however small, are crushed by mobs like the JS-19 (a paramilitary arm of the government) and the police. This time, the killing of college students made peaceful protests spread like a wildfire. Dozens were killed while Ortega’s wife, in the style of George Orwell’s Big Brother, referred to war as “peace” and violence as “love.”

Protests and killings continued. May 30 is national Mother’s Day in Nicaragua. People took to the streets to honor the mothers of all the victims of the repression since last April (numbering 86 dead at that time). The Mother’s Day march became the biggest public demonstration against this government, ending when the paramilitary and police forces of Ortega and Murillo opened fire against the crowd. It was a massacre.

At the time I write this, the number of protesters killed by the regime since April 18 is over 146. It is clear that Ortega and his wife, after 11 years in power, will not resign by their own will.

There are brutal regimes around that world, why should Americans care about Nicaragua?

In early June, Nicaraguans were expecting the General Assembly of the Organization of American States to deliver an energetic condemnation about the massacre conducted by Ortega’s goons. Surprisingly, we learned that the Ortega regime and the Trump administration made some type of agreement on a softer statement, avoiding the stronger condemnation that was needed and expected.

The question is why. Why is president Trump doing favors for a thug like Ortega? Is this another favor from Trump to Ortega’s comrade, Vladimir Putin? Is it because Trump identifies with an egomaniac that clings to power no matter what? Is it in exchange for support from Ortega against Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela?

There are many questions, but few answers.

I hope these questions find a way into Americans’ hearts and minds. Why is Trump aligned with a genocidal leader like Ortega? Congress is discussing Nicaragua now, and readers can take action to help us stop the killings. Please call your representatives in Congress and urge them to care about Nicaragua. Why? Because of our shared humanity; or perhaps because instability in Central America could mean many more immigrants trying to get into the USA soon. Please call your congressman and spread the word that what is happening in Nicaragua is NOT a war; this is an armed state murdering unarmed citizens.

 

– Pedro Molina, editorial cartoonist, Nicaragua

This was originally posted at http://caglecartoons.com/column.asp?columnID=%7B5E7703E1-B85A-441F-ABBE-D82CD03CCB65

Joel Pett interviews the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Rob Rogers and asks why he objects to having his cartoons “pre-filtered through the sensibilities of humorless corporate lickspittles whose livings depend on not rocking the boat…or the ship of state.”

Share
A cartoonist is jailed. Another is charged with treason. A cartoonist disappears. Another is threatened by government goons. Throngs march against a perceived cartoon’s slight.

That’s how it goes among CRNI clients around the world, but not here. In corporate America, cartoonists merely lose their livelihoods. I’m not comparing unemployment to incarceration, but with those livelihoods go the paychecks, the health care, the secure retirements, the legal protections, and a lot more.

Strident, no-holds-barred newspaper editorial cartooning, spiraling into inexorable death throes for at least two decades, bleaches into a pile of bones on a changing media landscape, all due to uncertain advertising economics, right?

But what if it’s worse? What if losing our jobs is more than a lamentable byproduct of the well-documented industry convulsions that have also sidelined armies of shoe-leather reporters, photographers, copy editors, art critics, columnists, and on and on?

What if editorial cartoonists were not just victims of economic hard times, but unabashedly discarded for challenging the country’s leadership and direction? And what if this happened to mainstream cartoonists, at big-city dailies, during an administration which has expressed admiration for thug regimes around the globe and promoted policies akin to tin-pot dictatorships?

It just happened to Rob Rogers at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. CRNI board chair Joel Pett spoke to him about it.

Pett: Hey Rob, anything new?

Rogers: (laughs) Nothing much.

P: So, I need to interview you for CRNI, but haven’t the patience or training for transcription, so suppose you just share your thoughts and I’ll back-load questions to which they make reasonable answers?

R: (chortles) That sounds fine.

P: You’re familiar with CRNI, and have been a generous supporter. How much of a stretch is it to put you somewhere on the spectrum of persecuted cartoonists?

R: Well, I got the news from corporate HR drones, not jackbooted brutes. So there’s that. And I’ve been trying to explain to some of my friends and supporters that this isn’t exactly censorship.

P: Because you can still say what you want, just not in the pages of the Post-Gazette?

R: Right. I can post them on bulletin boards and staple them to telephone poles!

P: Sure, or the internet equivalents. But you see why your followers find it heavy-handed?

R: Of course, and I appreciate their backing.

P: I saw that the mayor of Pittsburgh publicly supported you, that there were protests at the paper, and, of course, the cartoonists are righteously outraged.

R: Well, according to John Robinson Block, outrage isn’t an attribute you want in a cartoonist.

P: Block is the publisher who fired you?

R: Yeah.

P: Would you like to publicly excoriate him in some deeply personal and expletive-littered manner right now?

R: (chuckles) No, but there were sure aspects of this that he deserves to be ashamed of.

P: Like?

R: Well, for a start there were those widely-scorned racist editorials. I knew then that this wouldn’t end well.

P: They offered you a freelance arrangement right?

R: A truly terrible one. Paid virtually nothing and required me to hatch ideas in concert with management.

P: You know, creatives do their best work when it’s pre-filtered through the sensibilities of humorless corporate lickspittles whose livings depend on not rocking the boat. Or the ship of state.

R: Ha! Right!

P: So, now what?

R: Well, I’ll still draw for my syndicate clients and I’ve had some encouraging freelance offers. It’ll work out.

P: I saw the Sunday New York Times ran a piece you wrote about all this. Since they don’t print editorial cartoons at all, but somehow just managed to garner the Pulitzer for cartooning, maybe they could use you?

R: (snickers) I’d work for half of what Tom Friedman gets.

P: You’d work for a quarter of it. Thanks for taking time. I’ll call you in a few days, when the media blitz has died down and you’re on the verge of despair.

R: Thanks.

UPDATE: an equally wry cartoon strip penned by Rob about his recent and much-publicized change in circumstances is available at The Nib.

Interview: Saba’aneh on the “red lines” for a Palestinian cartoonist

Share

CRNI Executive Director Dr. Robert Russell speaks with our Regional Representative for Palestine, cartoonist Mohammad Saba’aneh following his recent detention by Israeli border guards and confiscation of artwork.

Russell: To your knowledge are there other cartoonists in Palestine or Israel who are being harassed, questioned or worse from any of the major players in the conflict: PLO, Hamas, IDF et al?

Saba’aneh: Yes, one of my friends, Osama Nazzal, was under investigation from the IDF because of his cartoons. Ismael Albazem, a cartoonist from Gaza was arrested by Hamas because he did a lot of cartoons criticizing Hamas movement. Actually, I am the only one who has faced pressures from all sides at the same time.

R: What are the “red line” rules for a cartoonist working in Palestine right now? Have these red lines changed at all since President Trump named Jerusalem as the location for the new US embassy?

S: There is no relation between Trump’s decision and the red lines in Palestine. Always our critical red line is the portrayal of religion and the sensitivities of any political party which has nominated that religion as a strategy and title for them, like Hamas and Al Jihad.  I faced a big campaign against me, organised threats via mobile phone calls because I did a cartoon criticizing one of these parties.  I think this political party converted its faithful into a tool of censorship under the name of religion.  They became a “holy” political party and the people deal with them as if God’s Representative.

R: Focusing on your case: do you think the authorities will return the tapestry cartoon that they seized from you last week?

S: Certainly not. I think Israeli security understood the value of cartoons after Charlie Hebdo and how the world engages with and respects this art form. Israel started attacking cartoonists by many means; arresting them, investigating and accusing them of anti-semitism. That happened recently with a German cartoonist, not just Palestinian cartoonists. I am sure the Israeli security forces will take further action against me. I do not know what exactly, but they are escalating against me and the art of cartooning. The problem is I am the only cartoonist working in Israeli-controlled Palestinian territory.

R: Would it help if we wrote a letter, admittedly I don’t know exactly where we would send it, encouraging the return of your property?

S: I think if I scale up any protest and demand they give me the print back it will only encourage them to ban me from travel.  I should be careful with them, this is not the first time they did some things against me but this time I chose to talk about it publicly.

R: What are the media outlets in the Middle East/Palestine that you trust to tell the truth, or what might be closest to the truth on all sides?

S: In terms of the Arab situation I do not trust many. Mostly I try to get my information and news from BBC and CNN.

R: Are other artists, dramatists, singers, or any other kind of arts professional also getting criticism? Are any of them being threatened or are they under any danger? If so, who are they?

S: In addition to Nazzal and Albazem… Graffitti artist Hamza Abu Ayyash because of an image on his Facebook page. Majida Shahen, cartoonist, she did a cartoon against Al Jihad Al Islami and they threatened her with death.

R: Do you want to continue to run cartooning workshops?

S: Yes sure, later in the summer I’ve arranged a short workshop for special needs kids under the name of CRNI.

R: Thank you for your continuing dedication and courage, Mohammad.

 To Report a Cartoonist in Danger  Email Cartoonists Rights Network International

Cartooning for Peace condemns sacking of German Cartoonist

Share
From Cartooning for Peace’s press release:

Cartooning for Peace protests against the Süddeutsche Zeitung’s
dismissal of the German cartoonist Dieter Hanitzsch because of the
following cartoon published in the same newspaper on 15 May
2018.

It represents Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in an outfit and decorum
referring to Israeli singer Netta Barzilai’s victory at Eurovision 2018. He pronounces
the sentence “Nächstes Jahr in Jerusalem!” (Next year in Jerusalem!), tweeted by the
leader of Israel following the victory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It is up to each person to make his or her own idea and judgement, according to his
or her experience, opinions and individual knowledge. Dieter Hanitzsch, who says he
made this drawing to criticize current Israeli policy and the exploitation of his
compatriot’s victory, explains its aim in an interview with the newspaper Dresdner
Neueste Nachrichten.

Kurt Kister, the newspaper’s editor, while acknowledging from the outset that in his
view the cartoonist he has known for a long time is neither racist nor anti-Semitic,
reacted to the decision in an article published on the newspaper’s website2.
While he does not consider the cartoon as being anti-Semitic, he shares the many
individual and public criticisms and attacks that detect a series of anti-Semitic
stereotypes and clichés in the cartoon that, even if not knowingly used for this
purpose, would be likely to be understood as anti-Semitic or feed into such discourse.
In this context, the Stürmer is even mentioned, a newspaper pushing the Nazis’ anti-
Semitic obsession to its extremes. As for the newspaper’s second editor, Wolfgang
Krach, like his colleague, maintains that the drawing could be interpreted as anti-
Semitic. He added that this had been the subject of internal and external debate and
that the decision to dismiss would be motivated not only by the design but also by
subsequent exchanges with its author. He apologized on behalf of the newspaper
and promised to review his editorial procedures to avoid further controversy.
In a nutshell: a cartoonist who, more or less, no one considers anti-Semitic, is
nevertheless dismissed in dishonourable conditions.

Cartooning for Peace deeply regrets the newspaper’s decision to dismiss the
cartoonist for this cartoon as a result of public pressure. Cartooning for Peace also
regrets that the newspaper does not take even greater collective and editorial
responsibility for the newspaper and disassociates itself from its cartoonist once the
storm has started and then proposes to review its editorial approach to the
publication of the cartoons and revise it if necessary. Cartooning for Peace deplores
what amounts to a reduction in freedom of expression, all the more so as this type of
control is likely to become a model.
Cartooning for Peace, which has been fighting against anti-Semitism, Islamophobia
and all forms of racism since its creation, deplores an attack on freedom of
expression and the abusive dismissal of the cartoonist after a long career with the
Süddeutsche Zeitung newspaper.

Allenby Bridge: Saba’aneh detained, questioned, artwork taken

Share

The CRNI regional rep was questioned once again by Israeli forces.

Saba’aneh with his cartoons at the Bastogne festival, Belgium 2018

Just Word Books, publishers of Mohammad Saba’aneh’s cartoon collection White and Black have let us know that the cartoonist was detained and questioned on Allenby Bridge while journeying to his home in Ramallah from a cartoon festival in Belgium.

The full details of the events of May 31st can be read here. Of particular note is the reported confiscation of a substantial piece of artwork; Saba’aneh says a large cartoon print in the style of a narrative tapestry was taken from him.

Saba’aneh and international cartoonist colleagues look at the print of his work later confiscated by Israeli border forces.

In 2016 we were informed of a very similar incident when Saba’aneh re-entered the country from a work assignment in Jordan. Allenby Bridge is the sole entry point for West Bank Palestininans travelling abroad and was the site of his 2013 arrest that led to five months in prison.

CRNI’s regional representative in Palestine, Saba’aneh has in the past been harassed by officialdom on both sides of the border.

He is a courageous artist and campaigner dedicated to justice and peace. We trust he is unbowed by this latest affront but none the less condemn the baseless harassment and detention described and call for the immediate return of his property, its confiscation being an outrageous act of censorship and vandalism.

We commend Just World Educational for their unflinching support of Saba’aneh and his work.

 To Report a Cartoonist in Danger  Email Cartoonists Rights Network International

#IndexAwards2019 winner in “Campaigning” category

A proud partner in the Cartooning Global Forum

Categories

Archives

GDPR

Visitors to this site based in the EU – please be aware this site uses Cookies. Full details in our Privacy Policy.